
Ladies and Gentlemen, please place your bets: Who's the priest Squiggy will see?
`Oldone wrote:This series of strips is pretty excellent commentary, both on how law enforcement refuses to recognize viewing pornography for the dangerous crime that it is, and how people like Slig, once finally realizing what they've done, are far too busy feeling sorry for themselves to realize that they aren't the victim, and it's not about them.
ZarquonsNiece wrote:`Oldone wrote:This series of strips is pretty excellent commentary, both on how law enforcement refuses to recognize viewing pornography for the dangerous crime that it is, and how people like Slig, once finally realizing what they've done, are far too busy feeling sorry for themselves to realize that they aren't the victim, and it's not about them.
I's say that exploiting peoples basic self-centreness is the only way to reduce porn usage and mitigate it's effects. In the same way that your unlikely to convince someone to stop using cocaine by explaining the plight of the Colombian small farmer a man is probably not going to cut down his porn viewing when he's told that the woman he's watching was most likely pressured into appearing and was underpaid. After all he can see that she's enjoying herself.
People will only ever walk away from something toxic when they focus on how it's damaging their lives.
While I agree that reforming ones bad behavior should go beyond just 'oneself' and go towards the people you negatively effect, I find it a little unreasonable to say that Squig needs to just 'get over himself' right away. This is what, the first couple of days after doing something extremely personal, self reflective, and realizing the gravity of what horror he feels a participant in. That takes a lot to process, for anyone.Oldone wrote:ZarquonsNiece wrote:`Oldone wrote:This series of strips is pretty excellent commentary, both on how law enforcement refuses to recognize viewing pornography for the dangerous crime that it is, and how people like Slig, once finally realizing what they've done, are far too busy feeling sorry for themselves to realize that they aren't the victim, and it's not about them.
I's say that exploiting peoples basic self-centreness is the only way to reduce porn usage and mitigate it's effects. In the same way that your unlikely to convince someone to stop using cocaine by explaining the plight of the Colombian small farmer a man is probably not going to cut down his porn viewing when he's told that the woman he's watching was most likely pressured into appearing and was underpaid. After all he can see that she's enjoying herself.
People will only ever walk away from something toxic when they focus on how it's damaging their lives.
While I agree with what you are saying, it's still an extremely negative trait of men. They realize how porn is damaging their lives, walk away from it, then spend the rest of the time either pitying themselves for ever being addicted or self congratulating themselves for getting away from it. Meanwhile, the actual victim, the female porn star, is still suffering, is still being held captive and raped on film, and they did absolutely nothing what-so-ever to help or benefit her in the slightest.
Squigley, in this case, is a representation of men who need to get over themselves and realize that it's not about them and how they feel while wallowing in self pity, it's about the women that they violated, who are being glossed over.