![Image](https://64.media.tumblr.com/e3d53fdfaeceaa22bf36263bc382a17d/35046eb564430731-3e/s640x960/8e6dbb9173504a9ac2e86b2b3657431c54127204.png)
Speaking of myocarditis due to vaccination
![Image](https://64.media.tumblr.com/e3d53fdfaeceaa22bf36263bc382a17d/35046eb564430731-3e/s640x960/8e6dbb9173504a9ac2e86b2b3657431c54127204.png)
Call me Celina. This forum still have a long way to go until it gets filled with its intended public. And I'll do my best to help us reach that goal. I'm a battleaxe, and when you hear my voice it'll be as loud as a thunder and as clear as a blue sky.
- RikkiTikkiTavi
- Posts:139
- Joined:Fri Aug 10, 2018 6:12 am
Re: Speaking of myocarditis due to vaccination
Yes, the over-hype regarding such a small percentage of issues.
Here is another one that just came out:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... d-J-J.html
This will cut down on those willing to get a shot or a booster because the J&J is known to have less 'skin reactive' responses than the others. It also is an 'old style' of vaccine that is not using the mRNA style of the Pfizer and Moderna. Many people who are vaccine hesitant are more willing to try an 'old style' vaccine versus what is considered new and unknown (the mRNA).
I get that the Pfizer and Moderna are supposedly more effective against Omicron, but all of them are struggling against the new variants.
There is over-hype and misinformation crap associated with the both the promotion of vaccines and also with the scare tactics of the anti-vax group.
Here is another one that just came out:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... d-J-J.html
They are recommending the Pfizer or Moderna shot instead. But this is another case of over-hype. Yes, there is a blood clot risk for a certain group, but 9 is not a huge number compared to the 16 million that had no problem with the shot.CDC warns Americans NOT to get J&J shot over blood clot risk following nine deaths...
This will cut down on those willing to get a shot or a booster because the J&J is known to have less 'skin reactive' responses than the others. It also is an 'old style' of vaccine that is not using the mRNA style of the Pfizer and Moderna. Many people who are vaccine hesitant are more willing to try an 'old style' vaccine versus what is considered new and unknown (the mRNA).
I get that the Pfizer and Moderna are supposedly more effective against Omicron, but all of them are struggling against the new variants.
There is over-hype and misinformation crap associated with the both the promotion of vaccines and also with the scare tactics of the anti-vax group.
Re: Speaking of myocarditis due to vaccination
jfc, i tho the fearmongering was already bad enough... like we say in brazil: "o buraco é mais embaixo"
Call me Celina. This forum still have a long way to go until it gets filled with its intended public. And I'll do my best to help us reach that goal. I'm a battleaxe, and when you hear my voice it'll be as loud as a thunder and as clear as a blue sky.
Re: Speaking of myocarditis due to vaccination
Google translates that as "the hole is further down".
???
???
Re: Speaking of myocarditis due to vaccination
this is what you get for using google translate on an idiomatic expression.
Call me Celina. This forum still have a long way to go until it gets filled with its intended public. And I'll do my best to help us reach that goal. I'm a battleaxe, and when you hear my voice it'll be as loud as a thunder and as clear as a blue sky.
Re: Speaking of myocarditis due to vaccination
*Phew!* Thanks for clearing that up.
Re: Speaking of myocarditis due to vaccination
On 22/02/2022 (d/m/y) Tat disgraced himself by fearmongering and blood libel.
By the way, 22/02/2022 (d/m/y) is a palindrome, the only one we will witness.
By the way, 22/02/2022 (d/m/y) is a palindrome, the only one we will witness.
Re: Speaking of myocarditis due to vaccination
Oh yeah?! Well that date is coming up so you better be ready for it!
-Russly
-Russly